MyDistricting | VIRGINIA
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
New Virginia Majority - House of Delegates
Provide your comments for consideration in the 2021 Redistricting process
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
Population and Geography based on 2020 census
Loading...
Kenneth Nixon
I am not clear as to the reasoning for splitting up Manassas City between two delegate districts. It makes no sense for a jurisdiction like this to have a their representation essentially diluted and divided into two separate counties.
Daniel Eisert
One district for Ashburn, one for Sterling. Don't divide both towns (and the neighborhoods within them) in half.
Kripa Patwardhan
I don't agree with putting the Frying Pan precinct in 86 rather than 36. Frying Pan is part and parcel of the silver line corridor, and any districting map should reflect that.
Tim Baird
HD 60 and HD 27 are unacceptable. They split Bon Air in two pieces and then connect our community to portions of Henrico (like Short Pump) with which we do not share a close community of interest, such as we do with the portions of Richmond on the southside of the River and the portion of Henrico immediately across the Huguenot Bridge. This map reflects the kind of gerrymandering nonsense that the redistricting process was supposed to end. Hard No on this map.
Tim Baird
As a Bon Air resident, this proposed map would split Bon Air in half, with half of the community included in HD 60 and other half included in HD 27. The map would also play games with the 288 corridor and include a sliver of Western Henrico all the way to Short Pump in the same HD 60 that includes the western half of Bon Air. This type of gerrymandering is what the redistricting commission is supposed to end. While Bon Air definitely shares a community of interest with the Western portions of Richmond and Henrico along the James River, it does not share a community of interest with many of the areas included, and has the closest connection to our neighbors that would be located in HD 27. Do better.
Gay Donna Vandergriff
Thank you for keeping the Glen Allen area alongside Staples Mill Road and alongside Mountain Road together as drawn into a new district numbered here as 72. However, this version cuts across two distinct magisterial district lines used for Supervisor and School Board representation in Henrico County – Brookland and Three Chopt – and has a very small area that is served by the City of Richmond rather than Henrico County. I ran for the House of Delegates as a Republican from this area in 2019 in what is presently drawn as District 72 and I am very familiar with the area. Further, this drawing of districts 72 and 73, as shown, creates a District 60 which is very disjointed and does not recognize the distinct differences between the areas north of the James River (Henrico) and south of the James River (Chesterfield). In my 26 years here, the James River has served as a recognized line.
Judith N Frist-Riutort
This is one of the best representations for communities of interest and trying to follow community boundaries on the Peninsula.
Jennifer Adeli
The 34th here is a good version for this district. It keeps McLean and Great Falls both whole, and incorporates neighborhoods to the southwest of Route 7 that were recently redrawn into the Langley HS pryamid along with McLean and GF. These families play sports together, attend the same schools, shop at the same stores, and view themselves as neighboring communities of interest. This map also respects the guidance to avoid crossing county lines and a future HOD member would be able to represent this cohesive region.
E.B. Webster
This is fine except for instead of part of Gloucester, take north King and Queen. North of 360 Essex/KQ and KW are all very similar culturally
Fellissimo Gannon
I like that this map keeps Blacksburg and Radford together in a district, and that it keeps the district entirely inside of Montgomery County, mostly to the western half of the county. This area is a community that sees a lot of travel within it, for work, shopping, etc. I would keep the entirety of Blacksburg intact in a single district, but otherwise it looks good keeping Blacksburg, Radford, and Christiansburg together. I also appreciate that it only divides Montgomery County into two districts, and the districts are generally quite compact.
Fellissimo Gannon
I like that this map keeps Blacksburg and Radford together in a district, and that it keeps the district entirely inside of Montgomery County, mostly to the western half of the county. This area is a community that sees a lot of travel within it, for work, shopping, etc. I would keep the entirety of Blacksburg intact in a single district, but otherwise it looks good keeping Blacksburg, Radford, and Christiansburg together. I also appreciate that it only divides Montgomery County into two districts, and the districts are generally quite compact.
Fellissimo Gannon
I like that this map keeps Blacksburg and Radford together in a district, and that it keeps the district entirely inside of Montgomery County, mostly to the western half of the county. This area is a community that sees a lot of travel within it, for work, shopping, etc. I would keep the entirety of Blacksburg intact in a single district, but otherwise it looks good keeping Blacksburg, Radford, and Christiansburg together. I also appreciate that it only divides Montgomery County into two districts, and the districts are generally quite compact.
Cathy Hosek
District 44 on this map is drawn correctly. All of the residents of this area have the same concerns, attend the same schools and do not cross over the Alexandria City line. We have a lot of development happening along the Richmond Highway corridor from the Alexandria City line all the way down to Fort Belvoir.
Brittany Rose
I like proposed HD72 uncouples much of the Three Chopt district of Henrico (which is fully suburban) from surrounding rural counties, though I am concerned that the way that HD60 is drawn dilutes the Asian population of this area. The Three Chopt magisterial district population is 22% Asian and this district reduces that to 17% (which is worlds better than the 11% we are at now in HD56). I think this can be addressed by shifting the line between HD60 and HD72.
Peggy Layne
It's hard to tell but it looks like Blacksburg is entirely in district 7, which is good. I also like that Blackburg is combined with Radford and western Montgomery County. Blacksburg and Radford have a lot in common. I also like that Montgomery County is only split between two districts instead of 3 as it is at present.